Bridging the embargo gap between the US and Cuba through music

My experience watching music bring democracy and communism together during a study abroad trip in Cuba

Coming from a household that seemingly revolved around music, I’ve had my fair share of heavy music related experiences. Little did I know, it would be a study abroad trip to Cuba where Id truly see just how universal and influential music is.

Having barely passed Spanish 1 in high school with a C, I was mentally preparing to be frustrated by my inability to translate and understand, not just people, but music. Come to find out, I wouldn’t need those presaved Spotify playlists as much as I thought I would.

Though the Cuban government has, and still tries to retain a certain amount of filtering of what comes in from the United States, in both the sense of the trade embargo we placed on their country, and our culture in response to the embargo, music has managed to easily slip through the cracks, and the Cuban people love it just as much as you’d imagine us homesick college students did.

The non stop cultural fusion through music that occurs in Cuba really shines through in what we already consider to be one of the greastest classic rock songs of all time; Hotel California by The Eagles can be heard playing anywhere and everywhere just as it can here in the states. Little did I know the happiness I felt when I heard a friend of our professor strum those first few chords on the porch of our rental home in Tarara ,it would not be my last encounter with the song.

f21602048

I would find it again while hiking to our first water fall in the country side, being sang in Spanish by an elderly man sitting on a rock with his guitar over looking this scene.

f23448960

And again in an, odd but awe inspiring, trip to the “prehistoric wall” painting in Vinales, being played by two Europeans off their phone who had also climbed the rocks as a few of us on the trip also did, to just below where the mural start, in an attempt to get a good view of the mountains adjacent.

f29515584

And many more times throughout the two weeks abroad

f12560448

Just as with any lively town, its not uncommon to turn a street corner in Havana and find a band serenading the streets in both Spanish and English, or be invited to dance in a bar

f14300544

(Katherine Hamilton, a Flagler college journalism major part of the Study abroad trip being taught how to salsa by a local in a roof top bar overlooking the Malecon)

f22910144

(Musician at restaurant atop Soroa park and orchid gardens)

For the duration of the trip we had the same three taxi drivers take us from location to location. We eventually learned to find the drivers all Spanish selections on the radio soothing, and eventually familiar, mumbling along to some songs as the trip went on and we heard them more, serving as background for post hike van naps. However, we were ecstatic when he started playing hits like, Total Eclipse of the Hear, and Stevie Wonders, I Just Called To Say I Love You, when we first entered the van on the Fourth of July, the driver swaying back and forth with us as we sang in the back seats.

IMG_0336

(Carlos, one of our taxi drivers, who greeted us with Total Eclipse of the Heart on the fourth of July-photo courtesy Tracey Eaton )

Art and various other odes to musicians and band can also be found throughout Cuba, particularly John Lennon of the Beatles. In John Lennon park in Havana Cuba, a Statue of Lennon seated on a bench permanently resides in the park for photos, and just across the street a bar named, The Yellow Submarine, plays nothing but classic rock hits all day and night. Even the team of On Cuba, an independent media outlet in Havana, decorated their office with a quote from, Imagine, by John Lennon.

f14716032

IMG_1503

(John Lennon Statue in John Lennon Park, Havana Cuba-photo Courtesy Katherine Hamilton)

And of course, there were the night clubs. One of the most noteworthy of all, and such a crowd pleaser we had to make a second trip back the night before we flew home, was Fabrica de Arte in Havana. Factory turned nightclub and art gallery, is well worth the line that sometimes stretches around the side of the building, lucky for us, a family friend of our professor works as a security guard in Cuba and was able to talk the bouncers into sliding us ahead in line. First walking in your blinded by bright white walls, and have trouble paying attention as your explained how you drink card works because your eyes are catching glimpses of beautiful artwork peaking out from behind anyone from Cuba’s best dressed to fresh off a day of backpacking Europeans. Finally emerging from the initial crowd at the door, you find yourself in, literally, an art gallery. White from floor to ceiling with people quietly shuffling past pieces and sipping drinks. After so many rooms of back to back art, you find a hallway with people pouring out of it and can hear the thumping from speakers. Once you finally break through the doorway, you’re confused to find a huge nightclub and bar. This continues throughout the building for about three stories, with only one exit to try and find your way back down to. Some rooms are stages with live bands, some are DJs, but both English hits like Bruno Mar’s, That’s What I Like, to Spanish favorites like Despacito and Bailando served as the soundtrack to two amazing nights.

IMG_1022IMG_0934

(From art gallery to night club-photos inside Fabrica de Arte courtesy of Tracey Eaton)

One of my personal favorites had to be Casa de la Musica in Trinidad. After a decent trek up a notably steep hill on cobblestone streets, we arrive at the bottom of Casa de la Musica. Practically throwing my 1 or 2 CUC (Cuban convertible peso) cover charge at the bouncers, I was awe struck to be looking up at an outdoor, amphitheater style, stage surrounded by long benches carved into the limestone, packed full circle with people and waiters buzzing back and forth with trays full of drinks. After just a couple of minutes of finding our seats only 3 rows up from the stage left, the girls of the group were rushed down, not only to dance in the area in front of, but on stage too.

IMG_1364IMG_1368

(Casa de la Musica -Trinidad)

Though Casa de la Musica featured exclusively spanish hits, at least on the night we were there, just another trek up a hill to the right of Musica, you could find a line curving out of a cave on another hilltop overlooking more of Trinidad. A change up between english and spanish music by a DJ made the Cave the perfect spot to end the night..until you realize you have to hike back up out of the Cave after hours of dancing.

One of the more heart warming experiences by far, though, had to be getting news that we were invited to see a pin pal of one of the students of the study abroad group perform at a music venue in Havana. Flagler’s Hannah Pierce got into contact with Cuban singer and musician, Aurorita Feliu, and upon going to see her perform you could tell the rest of us were beyond thrilled she did. Not only did she have a one of a kind voice, she was pure talent on guitar, and had an equally as amazing band backing her. Though she had us fully mesmerized and swaying with the Spanish pieces she performed, she paused to introduce her “American friends”,the study abroad group, to the rest of the crowd, and begin singing Janis Joplin’s Mercedes Benz with just us snapping our fingers to accompany her. With other locals, and even some family and friends of our professor who were aiding us during the trip, joined in on the song, it was quite the emotional and culturally connecting experience for us all.

IMG_0808.jpg

(Aurorita Feliu performing in Havana Cuba- photo courtesy Tracey Eaton

“Imagine, OF all the people”? Fidel Castro’s, and the “real story”, behind John Lennon park

Beatlemania having swept over the world in the sixties is far from an over exaggeration, as we all know. But to find out that in 1964 Fidel Castro declared a nationwide ban of the Beatles’ music really puts into perspective the influence and reach music can have.

Castro saw the”fab four” as a symbol of the “vulgar consumerism” he resented and thought of the British band as “a tool of capitalist America”. Regardless of the ban, their music still made its way to Cuba’s youth underground, and two years late in 1966, the ban was lifted, although it still took some time for Cuba to allow all its people to embrace the rock and roll craze. In 1971 the Beatles show was aired for the first time over Cuban airwaves, but tension still remained towards the new culture of the 60s and 70s.

However, on December 8th of 2000, the 20 year anniversary of John Lennon’s assassination, a statue was unveiled on a park bench at 17th and 6th street in Havana park, also known as “John Lennon Park”. Somewhere in those 30+ years, John Lennon grew on even communist rebel Fidel Castro. Whether this actually stands as symbol of musical freedom in the new era of the Fidel rule is still up to debate among Cuban musicians, for Havana park didn’t get its British nickname along with the unveiling of the statue. This story actually begins months prior with a group of Cuban musicians.

john lennon park

Jorge Dalton recalls his participation in the original tribute to the icon in an article of the Havana Times. A group of Cuban musicians and other artists had the idea to pay tribute to the band and “right the injustice that the banning of the Liverpool Four in Cuba during the 60s and 70s had meant”. With the support of the National Committee of the Young Communists League, Cuban Radio and Television Institute, and various other members of the community, the group of artists planned to pay tribute on the roof top of the  Habana Libre Hotel at the same time as a film festival as an ode to the Beatles rooftop concert in England in 1969.

Everything was planned out and seemed to have the green light, until the actual day came. The National Committee of the Young Communists League withdrew their support and deemed the concert “inappropriate” and the Communist Party Leadership, relayed through the National Committee of the Young Communists League, said the concert was not to be authorized.

Although the group of artists attempting the concert greatly dwindled in size and lost the support of the  Cuban Radio and Television Institute, who were going to supply broadcast and audio equipment, the few remaining musicians persevered and decided to try Havana Park next.

News spread about the reattempt at the concert and the park was packed with people before they even started setting up. Rushed, unrehearsed, and improvised, the band began the tribute. Jorge recalls “pulling electricity  directly from streetlamps and people’s houses”, and even nearby police couldn’t help but join in, “The park was also surrounded by a long cordon of police officers, who ended up singing Yesterday, A Hard Day’s Night, Come Together and Let It Be along with us”. The tribute ended with Hey Jude after one musician, Carlos Varela, “took the microphone and proposed baptizing the park with the name of John Lennon”.

When Fidel presented the statue of Lennon at the park only months later, party leaders and members of the Cuban Radio and Television Institute who had tried to stop the concert prior were even present at the unveiling.

cuba concert

sources

Cuban Rum Diaries

Bacardi and Arechabala, or Cuba and Ricard? Who truly owns the name Havana Club Rum?

Bacardi, now the largest privately owned liquor company in the world, actually started out as a Cuban company. One of Bacardi’s signature bottles, Havana Club Rum, has actually been involved in a legitimacy war for years, and with Cuban boarders opening to the U.S., tourists are dieing to know the truth behind Havana Club Rum and the rightful owner of the brand name.

That story goes that Bacardi was actually a competitor  with one of the wealthiest families in Cuba prior to the revolution, Arechabala. However,in 1959 the Arechabala families company was confiscated along with hundreds of other Cuban companies at the time of Fidel Castro’s revolution. Bacardi, however,  managed to remain unaffected by the confiscation.

Bacardi, unlike the Arechabala family, had assets outside of Cuba and could continue production. The Arechabala family, sadly forced out of Cuba with nothing left to their names, eventually sold the recipe to their rival Bacardi. With the Arechabala recipe, Bacardi re-set up shop in Puerto Rico and went to work.

Clearly, this piece of the story isn’t the complex one, its the competitor Bacardi acquired after setting up their distillery in Puerto Rico that raises the war on who truly holds the name of Havana Club Rum. This competitor being the Cuban Government itself in joint with French beverage giant, Pernod Ricard.

The Cuban Government and Pernod Ricard started their partnership in 1993, and the war has waged not only on the market but also in court. Bacardi argues that Ricard and the Cuban government do not legally own the rights to the name Havana Club Rum due to the fact that the name was confiscated during the revolution, where as Bacardi actually was offered, paid for, and use the original recipe of the Havana Club name.

Pernod Ricard argue that although their rum is not made with the original Arechabala family recipe, their Havana Club Rum is the true Havana Club Rum solely because it is still made in Cuba, unlike Bacardi who have to make theirs in Puerto Rico. Ricard claims that without the Cuban climate to be distilled in, it cant be true Cuban rum.

The rum war ultimately comes down to morals and authenticity? or culture and tradition? According to Amparo Arechabala, the joint company likes to claim the Arechabala family abandoned their company and recipe, where as she and Bacradi argue they didn’t abandon Cuba, they were forced out along with everyone else. Its saddening to see something thats supposed to bring people together cause such heartbreak for one family, but also warming to hear Bacardi argue their fight for the name isnt just for authenticity and marketing, but for moral justice to the founders of the name and recipe, of course with high hopes this is true of Bacardi.

Was the Cuba crisis tailor made by Yellow Journalism?

Hearst and Pulitzer’s East coast-West coast rivalry and how it affected the Spanish American war

“You furnish the pictures, and I’ll furnish the war”- William Hearst

America’s “Imperialism age” and image as the world power it is considered today started around 1894 under president McKinley. It was considered America’s “new manifest destiny” and came into full swing  when the U.S. decided they wanted more political say in the Hawaiian government than what we were getting through the colony we had established there. Eventually the Dole family funded a political overthrow of the government, and when the  monarchy resisted, the U.S. responded by sending in troops. After queen Liliuokalani was forced to resign, the U.S. established Pearl Harbor naval base and eventually acquired a hunger for trade routes and a control of the oceans that Hawaii’s sugar trade and naval base couldn’t feed. This lead to our involvement in Spanish affairs in Cuba.

Cuba’s sugar trade was of a vastly larger scale than Hawaii’s, but the island was already being occupied by Spain. However, the Cuba Libre movement had been taking place throughout this time  – a common pattern of rebellious uprisings from the Cuban people against Spain. In an attempt to put an end to the uprisings, General Weyler set up what has come to be known as ultimately the blue print for concentration camps. 25 percent of Cuba’s population, nearly 300,000 people by the end of 1897, were placed into one of Weyler’s camps.

Weyler’s camp is where we first see yellow journalism resort to sensational headlines and prying stories out of Cuba. General Weyler was given the name “The Butcher” by yellow journalists in response to his “ruthless tactics”, turning American attention and sympathy towards the island. Journalists banked on how the public’s feeling of this demonstration of Spanish power being an uncomfortable 90 miles from our boarder,  and gave fuel to the current war between William Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer.

butcher

Prior to the 1890s, there had been a major news output on either coast, Hearst on the west coast, and Pulitzer on the east. In the 1890s, however, Hearst decided to open a rival newspaper in New York, dropping his price to 1 cent a paper (“penny press”). Pulitzer responded by doing the same, and the two companies eventually resorted to sensational headlines, and the creation of yellow journalism in order to attract sales, hence them resorting to naming general Weyler The Butcher. Prior to American involvement, Hearst hired an artist named Frederick Remington to “record” the war in Cuba between the rebellion and Spain. Hearst having supposedly told Remington, “You furnish the pictures, and i’ll furnish the war” giving way to yellow journalism’s control over how the American people viewed the affairs in Cuba.

In 1898, the U.S. battleship Maine is docked in Havana to “monitor development and protect American investment”.  On February 15th, the ship explodes, killing 299 Americans.Yellow journalists immediately go to work pointing blame at Spain, and soon “Remember the Maine, to hell with Spain” slogans and posters go up. When an investigation later proves that a fire in the boiler room, located right next to a weapons room, was the real cause of the explosion,  president McKinley choose to keep the new information quiet.

maine-headlinemaine

It wasn’t until the interception of the De Lome letter, a telegraph from Alfred Delome, the Spanish ambassador in the U.S., back to the Spanish saying our leader was “weak, catered to rabble, and a low politician” that McKinley started to consider war. The telegraph was made public and was even more fire for yellow journalists. President McKinley tried putting off entering war for as long as possible, believing our navy wasn’t strong enough, but eventually passed the Teller Amendment claiming our plan was “Cuban independence, not to annex”. America declared war on Spain on April 25th, 1898, and yellow journalists follow the troops in through future president, Theodore Roosevelt.

At this time, Teddy Roosevelt was the assistant secretary of the navy, and became deeply involved in American “imperialism”. He declared an invasion on the Philippines and put together the Rough Riders.Wanting to feed his love for the idea of war, Theodore agrees to Pulitzer’s offer of hiring him as a war correspondent for his newspaper. However, the only battle Theodore ended up reporting back to Pulitzer on was the battle of San Juan hill. With no one to say otherwise, Teddy may have made himself and the Rough Riders out to be more heroic than they may have actually been.Regardless,  Roosevelt ends up coming out of the war the most profitable and is even chosen as McKinley’s vice president for the election of 1900

.san-juan-hill

Without Hearst and Pulitzer’s feud creating sensational headlines, a need for news that would “one up” each other, and a willingness to go to any means necessary to create that news, the Spanish American war could have been brought upon in a completely different way, if at all. Relentless “egging on” from media in foreign and domestic affairs is clearly, nothing new.

Resources:

The “tangled ball of yarn” and where we may bat it to next

U.S.-Cuba relations. What they’ve been in the past and a glimpse of where they could be heading.

U.S.-Cuba relations is no new topic, and one of the many questions being raised right now is just what the Trump administration may do in regards to Cuba during his presidency. Fidel Castro’s analogy of the U.S.-Cuba embargo being a “tangled ball of yarn” is an all too perfect one for relations in general. The history between these two countries is a lengthy and complex one, so here is a general outlook on what may come, with focus solely on a few basic questions and information, and how they parallel with the secretary of states recent Q&A answers that have been really stirring up this topic of discussion.

Does the U.S. government have the right to prohibit American tourists from traveling to Cuba?

The answer to this question can initially lay in the statement, “freedom of movement is a Democratic ideal”. However, both the U.S. and Cuba have been accused of violating this ideal. The difference is, Cuba is not a Democracy, so there for this is not an ideal they have, or really should even be expected to have or abide by. The Cuban government is a communist political party, constitutionally defined as a “Marxist-Leninist”; a socialist state  guided by the principles and political ideas of Jose Marti, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Vladimir Lenin. However, there is a crime described in the Penal Code called Salida illegal del Pais meaning illegal exit from country. This stating also that there was/is a way to legally gain permission to leave the country. Emphasis on “legally gaining permission”. So while so far it may seem like the U.S. is in the wrong and Cuba is simply following the laws in place, whether they’re just or not, this argument can be take even deeper. Through the United Nations, there is the Universal Deceleration of Human Rights, which states that everyone has the right  to leave any country including his own. So yes, both countries are violating human rights, whether or not they are violating the rights laid out by their government. Which puts the U.S. even further into the wrong for not only violating one of our own Democratic ideals , but a human right as laid out by the United Nations, in an attempt to maintain pressure on the Cuban Government.

Is it okay for the U.S. government to continue to try to strangle the Cuban economy and cause an upraise to bring Democracy if it hasn’t worked for over half a century and has caused suffering to the Cuban people?

This is yet another question with a seemingly obvious answer, but since the beginning of the embargo that has been the main blow to the Cuban economy, many different factors and incidents have made this much more than a no brainier and worth the debate. El bloqueu, as the Cuban people refer to the embargo, is actually considered one of the oldest and most comprehensive against any country. Having started in the Eisenhower presidency the embargo lasted through nine presidents until 2014 when Obama announced his plans to normalize relations with Cuba and end the embargo.This embargo put restrictions on numerous necessary goods over the years, such as medicine, sugar, grain, petroleum, and various other environmental dimensions. It had intense effects on Cuba’s capital stock in U.S. manufacturing in the 1960’s, left Cuba highly vulnerable during the depression of 1990’s and caused trade to fall drastically with Cuba and increase drastically with the Soviet Union; from 68% in 1956 to 0% in 1962 with the U.S. and from less than 1% in 1958 to 49% in 1962 with the Soviet Union. Cuba estimates that the cumulative  cost  of the embargo was $116.8 billion in 2014. Obama had it right when he said, “When what you’re doing doesn’t work for fifty years, its time to try something new”.

Rex Tillerson’s Latin America policy Q&A

The secretary of state was eventually plainly asked, “Do you stand by PEOTUS Trump’s commitment to reverse the Obama Administration’s Cuba regulation until freedoms are restored to the island”?  Tillerman answered, “Yes. There will be a comprehensive review of current policies and executive orders regarding Cuba to determine how best to pressure Cuba to respect human rights and promote democratic changes“.  Seems like its going to be 54 years of something that doesn’t work .

How I’d like to see the administration proceed with relations with Cuba

I believe its pretty clear that I agree with giving up on the relations and embargo’s of the past. Cuba needs help economically and with human rights, but harshly projecting your form of government onto another that has rejected it for so long will do no good. How we choose to help the people of Cuba needs to be handled much more meticulously if we plan to make any progress with them or provide any real help to the people. Its as if America still views Cuba as simply another port for sugar trade for them to try and “free” from the Spanish as they did during the “American Imperialism age”.

Sources